Abstract
This article argues that political/security arrangements in the Persian Gulf based on balance of power are incapable of preserving security or stability. Balance of power systems generate tension, distrust, and war; however, those based on a “balance of security” generate peace, stability, security, and “constructive rivalry.” The security dilemma created by shifts in the balance of power since the 2003 Iraq crisis is explored to emphasize the need for the US to accept Iran’s role in the region’s security and for Washington and Tehran to establish an “accommodation that might advance the interests of all concerned.” Other matters addressed include reliance on great-power involvement in a regional balance of power; the need for the US to protect its regional allies with a “security umbrella;” and the impact of Iran’s nuclear program on the achievement of a balance of security. It is concluded that a security arrangement must encompass “a new definition of the nature of the threat; a precise understanding of the aim of all involved players; & an identification of common security concerns and interests.
PDF